frequently asked questions

Questions about our Challenges AND THE PROCESS:

  • Our district receives limited funding for building maintenance and improvements each year. Our maintenance staff has done an excellent job of maximizing this budget, but the reality is that many of Rippleside Elementary’s biggest challenges are beyond affordable repairs. For example, replacing the roof would amount to roughly five times our annual maintenance budget.

  • Maintaining the nearly 70-year-old Rippleside Elementary building is not a long-term solution for our youngest learners, regardless of enrollment. Rippleside has health, safety, and infrastructure problems that are limiting learning opportunities.

    We are committed to building a new PreK-6 school that is prepared to serve students for decades to come, and the Aitkin School Board believes doing so provides the best long-term value for students, staff, taxpayers, and the health of our community.

  • The Aitkin School Board carefully considered the value of repairing the existing building versus constructing a new school to fully meet students’ educational needs. You can see a comparison of the different options considered by the school board here.

    Cost estimates indicated that remodeling Rippleside would cost approximately 62% of the cost to build a new school, but provide only some of the learning space improvements that are standard in Minnesota schools today.

    As maintenance needs mount and the aging Rippleside building becomes less compatible with today’s teaching and learning needs, our district will be forced to sink more resources into keeping it suitable for students. Patchwork repairs will keep the building running, but do nothing to improve the day-to-day learning of our students.

    That is why the school board is proposing a plan to build a new PreK-6 school that would fully meet students’ health, safety, and educational needs while providing the best long-term value for our community.

  • The longer our community waits to improve our elementary learning spaces, the longer our students will learn in a building that does not meet their needs. Waiting to move forward could also make the project more expensive due to inflation and rising interest rates, leading to higher costs for local taxpayers over time. Facility assessments and community input have shown that a new school is a strong long-term option for the district.

  • The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) evaluates school district facility plans through its formal Review and Comment process. As part of that process, the commissioner must consider the economic and educational advisability of a proposed school construction project. The MDE created a guidebook to help school districts with facility planning, titled the “Guide for Planning and School Construction Projects in Minnesota.” 

    In Part 2.06 on pages 51 and 51, there are simple evaluation questions to help guide school districts and communities in making difficult decisions about whether it makes more sense to renovate an existing school or build a new one. As described in the MDE guide, the more “yes” answers there are, the greater the likelihood that a school facility, in its entirety, is not adequate for current student, staff, programming, and the community, and needs to be replaced. The result of this exercise re-emphasizes the school board’s long-term decision in the spring 2025 to build a new elementary school versus remodeling the existing facility. View the school board’s exercise here.

Questions about the plan:

  • On Tuesday, April 14, 2026, voters in the Aitkin School District will consider a three-question bond referendum:

    • Question One asks voters to consider a $49.79 million plan to replace the nearly 70-year-old elementary school with a new PreK-6 building.

    • Question Two asks voters to consider $3.19 million for additional bus storage to provide adequate space to store all district vehicles. Question One must pass for Question Two to pass.

    • Question Three asks voters to consider a $2.325 million investment in an additional gymnasium station attached to the new PreK-6 elementary school, which would be accessible to the public. Question Two can only pass if voters also approve Question One. Questions One and Two must pass for Question Three to pass.

    For complete details on the plan, visit the Plan page.

  • The plan would build a new school to replace Rippleside Elementary, solving the biggest problems facing our elementary students and staff, including:

    • Small, Limited Classrooms: Small classrooms make it hard for students to work together, do hands-on activities, and learn in small groups.

    • Safety and Security Risks: Lack of secured entrances, walkways, and building areas that aren’t handicap accessible, and crowded drop-off areas are safety concerns for students and staff.

    • Lack of Space for Student Support: There isn’t enough room to give students the special education and mental health help they need. 

    • Health Concerns: Poor air quality, inconsistent temperatures, and asbestos exposure create health concerns that distract from learning.

    • Small, Crowded Gyms: The main gym is too small, and the other gym is also used as a lunchroom, limiting space for classes, activities, and storing equipment. 

    • Hazardous Bus Garage: The outdated school bus garage is located off-site and near the railroad tracks, making daily transportation risky and inefficient.

  • Since 2016, Aitkin Public Schools has led a thoughtful facilities planning process to create an investment plan that reflects our community’s priorities and supports our students, staff, and residents.

    In November 2025, Aitkin Public Schools presented voters with a $65.44 million bond referendum to replace Rippleside Elementary School with a new building, and build an attached community wellness center and improved vehicle storage space.

    After voters narrowly rejected that referendum, school leaders re-evaluated district needs and gathered feedback from staff and community members to adjust the proposed plan. The school board reaffirmed that building a new PreK-6 school to replace the nearly 70-year-old Rippleside Elementary building provides the best long-term value for students, staff, and taxpayers.

    The new plan, proposed this April, addresses the same needs as before, with a 33% lower annual tax impact than the plan proposed in November 2025. 

    For more information on the process, visit the Process page.

  • A new PreK-6 school will provide a safe, efficient building equipped to fully support today’s teachers and curriculum, with:

    • Improved Classrooms and Student Support: New classrooms that are appropriately sized to support hands-on activities, small group work, and personalized learning. Dedicated special education spaces will provide enhanced services and support for students who need it most, and a new media center will offer a flexible area for reading, research, and group projects.

    • Enhanced Safety for Young Children: A controlled entrance and monitored main office will help ensure only authorized visitors enter the school. Separate drop-off zones for cars and buses will make traffic flow smoother and safer.

    • Easier Access for Students with Disabilities: The new PreK-6 building will be fully accessible, with ADA-compliant entrances, classrooms, and restrooms, making it easier for all students, staff, and our community to move around and access the building.

    • Healthier Spaces and Energy Savings: New heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, boilers, windows, and doors will improve air quality and temperature control while saving on energy costs. New plumbing and drainage systems will prevent leaks and water damage, creating a healthier space for students to learn and grow. The district would save a projected $35,000 annually on energy and maintenance efficiencies alone.

  • Our high school building is also aging and in need of investment, but the challenges at Rippleside are more urgent. 

    The district considered options to invest in the MS/HS as well during the planning process, but recognized that the cost of repairing or replacing both schools would create too large a tax impact for our community. However, the location of the new elementary building leaves open the opportunity of connecting a new middle/high school on the property sometime in the future.

  • At this time, a complete renovation of the high school is not being considered, though the district is continuing to assess and address the high school’s needs as part of our ongoing maintenance and improvement efforts. One of these priorities is evaluating the HVAC system to ensure it remains reliable and efficient. 

    The district has already made significant updates to the high school over the last several years. Following the rejected referendum in 2016, the science labs on the second and third floors and the second floor math wing have been remodeled. The main entrance, cafeteria, special education, and commons spaces were also remodeled to improve entryway security and small-group space for students. In the fabrication lab, new equipment such as laser and 3D printers have also been added.

    If the referendum is approved, cost and energy savings from the new elementary school will allow the district to redirect more maintenance funds toward the high school to address remaining needs.

  • Yes. In November 2025, Aitkin Public Schools presented voters with a $65.44 million bond referendum to replace Rippleside Elementary School with a new building, and build an attached community wellness center and improved vehicle storage space. Voters narrowly rejected this plan, but the challenges facing the building and our district – including undersized classrooms, poor air quality, and safety concerns – remain.

    After gathering feedback from teachers, parents, and community members, the school board reaffirmed that building a new PreK-6 school to replace the nearly 70-year-old Rippleside Elementary building provides the best long-term value for students, staff, and taxpayers. 

    That’s why the district is proposing an adjusted plan with a tax impact approximately 33% lower annually than the plan proposed in November 2025.

  • The April 2026 referendum will ask voters to consider an adjusted plan with an approximately 33% lower annual tax impact than the plan proposed during the November 2025 referendum. This was accomplished by reducing planned square footage for the new school, gym, and bus storage space, and extending the term of the bonds from 20 to 25 years. The updated plan will cost homeowners in Aitkin approximately 33% less annually than the November 2025 plan.

    In addition, the new plan will be proposed to residents as three ballot questions instead of two, giving voters greater control over the parts of the plan they wish to vote on. 

    For more information on the process, visit the Plan page.

  • The challenges at Rippleside Elementary are not going away. The district does not have enough money to fix and update the nearly 70-year-old building on top of ongoing maintenance costs that continue to rise over time. 

    If voters reject the referendum this November, Aitkin Public Schools will not receive the $5 million grant from the IRRRB. This rare funding opportunity is only available for the proposed referendum project, and future funding opportunities are not likely. 

    We work hard to keep up with the needs of our aging school building, but we’re just one step away from a major emergency that could disrupt student learning and school operations, like a broken boiler in the middle of winter or a plumbing failure. These emergency repairs cost more and make it hard to plan and budget facilities maintenance for both of our school buildings. Without a long-term solution, the district and school board will keep focusing on fixing the most urgent problems, using more of our budget to react to problems instead of preventing them.

  • In Minnesota, voters decide whether school districts can increase property taxes to pay for bonds to renovate and construct school buildings. Like a loan on a car or a mortgage on a house, the bonds are repaid over time plus interest.

  • Yes. In the last 10 years, voters in 181 Minnesota school districts have approved building bond referenda to finance construction projects.

  • Great schools benefit our community and those who call it home. They help attract families, support local businesses, and strengthen the quality of life in our area. A modern elementary school would make Aitkin more appealing to new residents and families, bring in jobs during construction, and open the door for future housing and economic growth. 

    For 150 years, Aitkin Public Schools have been a source of opportunity and pride. This proposed plan focuses on our most urgent need — a new PreK-6 elementary school — to ensure our schools continue supporting Aitkin’s future. It would also add a new gymnasium space for both school and public use, giving people of all ages a place to gather and stay active while strengthening the ties between our schools and the community.

  • The proposed new elementary school would be located on approximately 80-90 acres of 225 acres of land owned by the school district (34305 405th Place, Aitkin). The proposed referendum includes the costs of running water and sewer to the district-owned property.

  • In 2018, a community task force recommended a long-range goal of creating a single PreK-12 campus. Our district recognizes what it will take to make that vision a reality. That is why we are choosing an incremental approach with an emphasis on the most urgent need: a new PreK-6 school. If voters approve the April 2026 referendum, the new elementary school would be the first major step toward making a unified school campus.

    The district already owns land for a future unified campus and has secured IRRRB grant funding to support critical infrastructure work. While future phases to consolidate other school buildings and athletic fields are not yet scheduled or funded, we will continue to engage our community in long-term facilities planning for our schools. 

    This vision will take time. With each step, we’re building a stronger foundation for Aitkin’s students, community, and future.

  • If a new PreK-6 school is built, the district will put the Rippleside Elementary property on the market. If it doesn’t sell within two years, we will consider demolishing the building and selling the land as lots for new housing or development.

  • If the referendum is approved by voters this fall, the district will work closely with community members to determine how the new gymnasium space will be designed, managed, and scheduled. We’ve heard a clear desire for it to be a shared, accessible space that welcomes people of all ages year-round, which is our goal. As plans move forward, we’ll provide regular updates and invite input to ensure the gym meets the needs of residents.

    The new gymnasium station will have its own dedicated entrance for public visitors, and there will be no access to the school for community members during school hours. Movement between school and community spaces will be restricted, with key fobs used only by school staff.

Questions about the cost:

  • The total cost for the proposed plan is $55.3 million. It will be presented to voters as three questions: 

    • Question 1 would invest $49.79 million to build a new PreK-6 school to replace the nearly 70-year-old Rippleside Elementary on district-owned land 

    • Question Two would invest $3.19 million for additional bus storage to provide adequate space to store all district vehicles. 

    • Question 3 would invest $2.325 million to build an additional gymnasium station attached to the new PreK-6 school, which would be accessible to the public.

    If voters approve the plan, funding will come from a property tax levy beginning with taxes payable in 2027. Your individual tax impact will depend on the value of the property you own.

    Visit the Tax Impact page for more information.

  • If approved by voters, this investment will be supported by a property tax increase that would take effect in 2027 and be in place for 25 years. To estimate your specific tax impact, use our tax calculator. Learn more about the cost of the project on the Cost page.

    The monthly tax increase for a home valued at $175,000 is estimated to be approximately $11.67 for Question 1, $0.75 for Question 2, and $0.58 for Question Three for a total of about $13 per month if all three questions are approved. 

    For a $300,000 home, the monthly increase would be about $22.58 for Question One, $1.50 for Question Two, and $1.08 for Question Three for a total of $25.17 per month if both questions are approved.

  • Minnesota offers several tax refunds and deferrals that can reduce the tax impact of a referendum. For example, over half a million Minnesotans receive the Homestead Credit Refund. Learn how this refund could potentially offset some of your tax impact from the referendum on the Tax Relief Opportunities page.

  • Estimated costs of a proposed building plan are based on the project scope, square footage, student enrollment, furnishings and equipment, regulatory compliance, local labor and construction market conditions, and contingency planning.

  • The district considered several options, ranging from basic completion of deferred maintenance to building a new school on a new site. Each option would require a tax increase, but only the proposed referendum plan would improve safety, meet all guidelines set by the Minnesota Department of Education, and avoid disrupting students during the construction period.

  • The April 2026 referendum will cost the homeowners approximately 33% less annually than the November 2025 plan, depending on the value of your home. 

  • Yes. As part of the district’s planning process, we are actively exploring other funding sources to help offset costs and reduce the impact on property owners. 

    Ahead of the November 2025 referendum, the Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB) agreed to grant Aitkin Schools $5 million to support a new elementary school building, contingent upon a successful referendum. The IRRRB has agreed to provide this grant again should the April 2025 referendum be approved. Members formally reauthorized the grant opportunity during their meeting on Thursday, Feb. 12.

    The district has also requested bonding money and a construction sales tax exemption from the state legislature.

    This grant and other, smaller sources of state aid are already factored into all tax impact projections.

  • To reduce the impact of a bond referendum on owners of farmland, Minnesota’s Ag2School tax credit offers a 70% tax credit to all agricultural property except the house, garage, and one acre surrounding the agricultural homestead. This is not a tax deduction – it is an automatic dollar-for-dollar credit, with no application required.

  • The bond would be in place for 25 years, after which the associated tax would expire.

  • The bond referendum budget cost includes approximately $9.79 million for site work, parking, utilities, road access, stormwater. This includes the cost to bring city water and sewer to the property. These will be sized to meet all future school needs, including the possibility for a future high school.

  • Bond referendums apply to all property types, including residential homes, businesses, seasonal recreation property and agricultural land. For owners of agricultural land, Minnesota’s Ag2School Tax Credit offers a 70% tax credit to all agricultural property except the house, garage, and one acre surrounding the agricultural homestead. This is not a tax deduction – it is an automatic dollar-for-dollar credit, with no application required.

  • Yes. Receiving the $5 million grant from the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB) changed the total cost of the referendum from $60.3 million to $55.3 million, directly reducing the impact of the referendum on local taxpayers. The IRRRB grant is a rare funding opportunity that depends on the approval of the referendum.

  • No. The school district would not be able to access the $5 million IRRRB grant if it held an election in November 2026 rather than April 2026. Due to the school board’s prompt action to pursue an April 2026 referendum, the IRRRB had not yet reallocated the grant funds associated with the failed November 2025 referendum. The IRRRB indicated its willingness to, once again, provide a $5 million grant in support of a new elementary school, contingent upon voter approval of the April 2026 referendum. Preserving this $5 million grant is one of the critical reasons the school board is asking for voter approval on April 14, 2026. You can review the full IRRRB application on our Resources Page.

  • If voters reject the referendum this November, Aitkin Public Schools will not receive the $5 million grant from the IRRRB. This rare funding opportunity is only available for the proposed referendum project, and future funding opportunities are not likely.

  • Yes—the referendum project includes $1.5 million specifically for new furniture, fixtures, equipment, and technology. This means classrooms, offices, and shared spaces will have the items needed to support student learning and staff work from day one. If approved by voters, the referendum would provide a fully functional, ready-to-use school that reflects the needs of our students and community.

  • When comparing the tax impact of the November 2025 plan to the April 2026 plan, the difference is approximately 33%. For more details, please view Slide 22 of our Referendum Presentation. Please note that the term of the bond was extended by 5 years to a total of 25 years.

  • Capitalized interest on a bond referendum is the practice of using a portion of the bond proceeds to pay the interest costs on that debt during the project's construction phase, rather than paying that interest immediately from tax revenues.

    The district would not be able to make a tax levy to fund payments on the new bonds due during fiscal year 2027, so those payments are made from bond proceeds.

Questions about Design/Construction:

  • If voters approve the referendum, the district would move into the design phase in Spring 2026. The design phase would include input from staff, parents, and residents. Construction would likely begin in late spring of 2027, with project completion estimated in the fall of 2028.

  • The district has worked closely with ICS, a consulting firm experienced in school construction, to estimate the project cost. The district will continue to work with ICS throughout the construction process to ensure the project remains on time and on budget.

  • Yes, discussions with MnDOT and our design team started a year and a half ago. If the referendum is passed, MnDOT is prepared to meet with our team to consider safety suggestions for the 169 intersection.

  • The district would follow a competitive bidding process in accordance with Minnesota state law. Any contractor qualified for commercial construction would be eligible to submit a bid. All bids would be received at the district office and publicly opened, and the contract would be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

Questions about voting:

  • Election Day is Tuesday, April 14, 2026. Early voting will begin on Friday, February 27, and will be available through Monday, April 13.

    Learn more on the Vote Page.

  • Yes, the sample ballot can be viewed here.

  • Yes. All district residents can vote early in person starting Friday, February 27, through Monday, April 13, at the Aitkin County Auditor’s office (307 2nd Street NW, Aitkin, MN 56431), including residents of Crow Wing County. Residents can also vote early by mail. Learn more about early voting on the Vote Page

  • Please use the Connect page to send questions or feedback to the district.